Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Commentary for Bava Metzia 71:17

אמר רבא כל המפקיד

Rami b. Hama objected [from the following Mishnah]: If one deposited money with his neighbour, who bound it up and slung it over his shoulder<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'behind him.' ');"><sup>13</sup></span> [or] entrusted it to his minor son or daughter and locked [the door] before them, but not properly,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., he shut them in the house, so that they could not go out with the money, but did not close the door properly. ');"><sup>14</sup></span> he is responsible, because he did not guard [it] in the manner of bailees.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. infra 42a. ');"><sup>15</sup></span> Hence, it is only because they were minors; but if they were adults, he would be free [from liability]. Yet why so? Let him say to him, 'It is not my desire that my bailment should be in the hands of another person'! — Said Raba: He who makes a deposit

Tosafot on Bava Metzia

From here it is possible to prove that the law is like the opnoin that holds that a renter is similar to (in responsibility) a paid watchman.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Tosafot on Bava Metzia

its also possible to prove from the start of chapter a widow to a kohen Godal (Yevumas 66b) and in chapter the borrower (later in Bava Metzia 97a) in the case of mareimer the son of chanina .....
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse